Another take on Spinning

A really good blog post about spinning, for those of you who don’t participate in it.

Keep_the_Fit's avatarkktrainingsystems

Spinning is a form of exercise that focuses on endurance, strength, intervals, high intensity (race days) and recovery. It  involves a special stationary exercise bicycle with a weighted flywheel in a classroom setting. The features of the stationary bicycle include a mechanical device to modify the difficulty of pedaling, specially shaped handlebars, and multiple adjustment points to fit the bicycle to a range of riders. Many exercise bicycles have a weighted flywheel which simulate the effects of inertia and momentum when riding a real bicycle. The pedals are equipped with toe clips which allow for one foot to pull up while the other is pushing down. Some exercise bikes have clip-less receptacles for use with cleated cycling shoes.

A spinning class involves a single instructor at the front of the class who leads the participants through routines designed to simulate terrain and various outdoor riding situations. Some of the movements…

View original post 558 more words

BBC News – Inactivity ‘killing as many as smoking’

Inactivity is a truly silent killer.  Too many Americans, and others in the developed world, simply do not move enough to maintain minimal standards of health.  There are many culprits, and no doubt the easiest one pundits will blame is probably video games.  I take issue with that, however.  In the 19th century politicians and social critics railed against the evils of too  much reading; it will make you act out, unable to distinguish fantasy from reality, and make you lazy sitting around for hours every day.  In the 20th century it was television.  Now it’s video games.  Every new mode of entertainment frightens, distresses, and annoys those too old to understand it.  If it didn’t annoy the older generation, it probably wouldn’t be popular in the first place.  Regardless, these excuses don’t hold water.  Individuals can abuse anything, but the fact is we have created a society that does not privilege physical activity unless you happen to be physically gifted to begin with.  Gym is usually one of the first things eliminated from budget strapped schools, right after the arts, rather than raise taxes in order to be able to continue offering these vital programs.  No one wants their taxes raised, but then decry when their services are cut.  Why do so many of us insist on believing in the magical free ride?  Worried about corruption and waste?  Grow up!  it exists in every human endeavor.  It exists in your own homes ever time a husband or wife holds back a little extra from a paycheck, or a child keeps the change when the are sent out on an errand, or a freaking credit card is used for any reason!  If you can’t escape waste, fraud, and corruption in your own home, what magical world do you live in that allows you to believe it won’t exist in the public sector?  Get over it.  Put your money where it belongs, into the future for your children, and that future should include you living long and healthy enough to play with your grandchildren.

So now that I’ve given you my two cents, read this article published in the prestigious Lancet.

BBC News – Inactivity ‘killing as many as smoking’.

Work Out Posts

Everyone is looking for the magic routine or the magic exercise, as if there is some secret that will transform your body better, quicker, easier, than any other.  Sorry.   That doesn’t work.  People always assume that the advice they can get from some super trainer of celebrities is going to work better than they could get from their neighborhood gym trainer.  Uh-uh. The advice you get from any trainer is going to be the same crap shoot you’d get from any other trainer.  You have no way of knowing if the advice is good or bad unless you have good knowledge to know better yourself, and the average gym goer simply doesn’t.

This brings me to one of my personal issues with training blogs, in general. Most of the blog posts out there (and I subscribe to more than a few) seem to focus on describing killer routines or Best Butt Busting exercises (or any other body part you might want to develop).  They can’t all be the best, can they?  This is sensationalism at it’s most idiotic.There is no magic and there are no shortcuts.  There is knowledge and evidence based training, and there is bullshit.  Every exercise is a tool, but not every tool is appropriate for every job.

The problem I have with these posts is that there seems to be an assumption that the reader will understand how to do these workouts and exercises properly, and be able to integrate them into their existing workouts effectively.  Inevitably, someone writes in how following so and so’s advice led to a major knee, lower back or other musculoskeletal injury and that so and so doesn’t know what they’re talking about and is a horrible trainer.  Most of my readers are not fitness professionals or professional athletes, and I have no way of knowing if any specific advice I give will be followed properly, but I will be held responsible by that person if anything goes wrong.  It almost never seems to occur to these complainers that perhaps they did the exercises badly, or improperly implemented the advice.  All the same, I fault the Fitness expert writing for not properly qualifying their advice.  I also blame them for giving too much of this kind of advice.  Every other post seems to tout this or that exercise as the best for a specific muscle group, and the posts in-between talk about this or that routine as being the greatest.  As these bloggers and professional writers are far and away the most popular, I suppose I can’t totally condemn them.

That said, people still want to know:  what is the best exercise routine a person can follow for overall fitness?  So here it is, a routine that will absolutely get you in great shape if you do it fervently every other day till the day you die,  assuming you follow all the rules of intensity that I’ve laid out innumerable times and you are otherwise physically healthy with no major pre-existing injuries:

  1.  Walking Lunges with dumbbells: perform up to 7 sets, with rep ranges between 12 steps and 30 steps, so long as the last 3 steps of every set are exhausting.
  2. Pull ups/Lat Pulldowns: perform up to 7 sets, with rep ranges between 6 and 15 reps, making sure the last rep of every set is almost impossible to complete.

    A US Marine Doing Pull-ups.
    A US Marine Doing Pull-ups. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
  3. Push Ups (toes or knees): perform up to 7 sets, as many reps as you can with good form on every set (even if it’s 50 reps on the 1st and 2 reps on the last).

    English: an exercise of chest
    English: an exercise of chest (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Make sure you know how to do every exercise correctly, or get a trainer to show you.  Just doing these three exercises, in the routine I’ve laid out for you, is the most perfect and magical workout ever devised by mortal man.  Do this every other day, throw in cardio on in-between days.   Don’t forget to eat like a champion athlete and sleep like a 10-year-old, and you will get into unbelievably great shape practically overnight (ok, in 6-12 months).

The Intermediate Exercise Enthusiast

The intermediate exerciser has learned at least 3 of the 5 important things in order to progress to this level, and it shows. Most serious health club exercisers fall into this category, though my personal observation is that no more than 20% of gym members ever make it to this level, and instead remain novices despite the amount of time they spend in the gym going from one activity to another. The Intermediate Exerciserhas lost significant body fat and has gained some real muscle, either in the form of size and bulk or muscular definition, or both, depending on their goal. The 5 critical things that the intermediate exerciser understands and conforms to:

  1. Consistency
  2. Intensity
  3. broad knowledge of muscle function
  4. Nutrition
  5. Rest

Lets take these 5 in order.

  1. Consistency is just what it says. You are committed to your workouts and have a schedule you will not deviate from when possible. You have set aside a certain number of days; typically 4-6; and a set amount of time; typically 60-90 minutes; and you train. This isn’t something you try to fit into your day. It is one of your highest priorities that you work the rest of your day around. When doing cardiovascular/aerobic training you have a protocol you follow and stick to it. When weight lifting, you typically follow some version of a split routine for your body parts, the classic example being Chest/Shoulders/Triceps on day one, Back/Biceps on day two, and Lower Body on day three. Then repeating that pattern for a six-day workout with one day off for complete rest. You will stick to this pattern till doomsday comes or until you change goals. Additionally, you understand the importance of your exercise routine; variation is not your friend in this regard. You need to stick to a routine that you can make comparative assessments on. That means the same, or extremely similar, exercises for each body part every time you train that body part. If your goal is to be the best marathon runner you can be, you don’t spend hours a week ridding a lifecycle or taking spin classes; you run miles, period! If your goal is to improve your overall muscular strength, or build muscle, you pick your exercises and do them repetitively for months on end, the only variables being that you will continuously push yourself to lift heavier weights every week or even every workout!
  2. Intensity is all about understanding your goal. It is the most important factor that will determine whether you actually achieve any measurable progress, whether it’s increasing you distance on a bike ride, speed in the 400 meter run, or your 1 rep max doing an olympic bench press. Trying to lose weight requires a certain intensity. Building muscle requires its own level of intensity. Improving athletic performance…has its own special intensity demands. Not understanding what intensity you need to achieve will undermine everything you try to accomplish. Too much high intensity training will undermine a marathoner, and too little will be futile for the sprinter or weight lifter. If you haven’t read my posts on intensity, or want to refresh your memory click here and here.
  3. Broad knowledge of muscle function means you really understand how all the major skeletal muscles move and work, and know a pretty broad range of exercises for each of them. It’s like having a large vocabulary of exercises to draw on. Since you also understand how the muscles work, it allows you to choose complimentary exercises when doing multiples per body part. You understand why you might want to do pec flys after olympic bench press, not before, or why doing lat pull downs after pull ups might be redundant, so doing dumbbell rows is the better choice to follow-up with in most cases. (Yes, there might be a valid reason to do both pull ups and lat pull downs in the same workout, but that wouldn’t be the most common combo or even the norm). You understand which exercises will enhance your athletic activities or hinder them, and train accordingly.
  4. Nutrition is simply the understanding that what you consume is both the fuel that moves you and the building blocks of what your body is made of. The cliche´ “You are what you eat” is precisely true. Trying to build a powerful body on a diet of McDonald’s, Pepsi, and Twizzlers, is akin to building a battleship hull out of corroded iron. If you can’t get serious about what you eat, get out of the gym. I follow the 80/20 rule. I eat extremely healthful 80% of the time, and don’t worry about the other 20%. The less fit you start, the more dedicated yo have to be. If you’re very overweight and extremely unfit, you need to follow the 100% rule; all healthy, all the time. Period. Don’t cry about fairness, it won’t help. As a fuel, the foods you eat (solid and liquid) all have their specific purposes, and understanding them is critical. Even the most wholesome foods misused can have a counterproductive effect if not properly applied. Every serious endurance athlete understands the importance of carb loading; where you consume vast quantities of mostly simple carbohydrates like pasta the day before the big race. Serious marathoners are extremely lean, carrying minimal body fat (reserve energy stores) to breakdown as the miles accumulate into the high teens. So they manipulate their diets to maximize the available energy on race day. If you don’t run over 100 miles a week, don’t eat like a marathoner, cause you’ll get fatter than a walrus in a well stocked zoo. 20 years ago everyone said eat all the pasta you want because that’s what skinny marathoners eat, now we say avoid all pasta! Both are stupid statements. The question is: how will eating all this pasta help me in my life’s pursuits! If it won’t, don’t eat so much. The strength athlete eats large amounts of protein because protein is what muscles are made of, and when trying to build bigger and stronger muscles your body needs these proteins to build your muscles into larger ones. If you don’t consume enough protein, your muscles simply cannot get bigger or stronger. It’s not magic. If you’re lifting weights with the correct intensity and not able to get stronger or bigger, it’s a pretty good bet you’re not eating enough protein. The most misunderstood food constituent is fat. Fat is neither good or bad. It is a very dense energy source and a necessary nutrient for a whole host of metabolic processes. Fat isn’t the villain in America’s obesity epidemic; people are the enemy of themselves. When it comes to weight control, what matters at the end of the day is how many calories you ate compared to how many you burned. The average 30-year-old woman burns around 1500 calories per day just staying alive. If her diet consisted of 720 calories of fat (80 g of fat; 1 g = 9 cal) and 600 calories split evenly between protein (60 g; 4 cal/gram) and carbohydrate (60 g; 4 cal/gram) she would be following a successful weight loss program! In 20 days, she will have lost 1 lb. Not the fastest program, but if we replaced all those fat calories (720) with proteins and/or carbs, her weight loss would be exactly the same. Fat doesn’t make you fat…eating too many total calories makes you fat and you not understanding your food makes you fat. Now lets not get into a debate of whether eating so much fat in a day is healthy in other ways, because that’s missing the point I’m trying to make.
  5. Rest is so basic and obvious that it’s absurd how little attention avid gym goers give to it, but the intermediate exerciser understands that the end of the workout is only the end of the beginning of the exercise process. For the endurance enthusiast or the strength training enthusiast sleep is understood as the point in your day when all the hard work is actually transformed into results. The results of your training and proper nutrition can only be realized after a good nights sleep. While asleep your body makes all the cellular and physiological adaptations to your body in response to what you did that day. If you don’t get good sleep, your improvement can be slowed, stalled completely, or even reversed into a negative (over training syndrome), when instead of performance improvements you see lower energy levels, lower endurance, lower strength, and more frequent injuries. Imagine if NFL players were required to play 3 days a week, or if every MLB team were only allowed to have 1 pitcher who had to pitch every single game. That’s obviously ridiculous because these athletes have a hard time going thru a regular season injury free. In my hypothetical, they’d be lucky to last a month before being permanently impaired. To a lesser intensity, that’s exactly what the majority of gym goers are doing to themselves, going from class to class to class, three to five hours a day, 5, 6, 7 days a week. Ms. Intermediate understands that if she gauges her intensity correctly she will be done with her workout in 45-90 minutes (unless a marathoner or other ultra endurance athlete) and she will eat properly and get her 7-9 hours of sleep.

In conclusion, you must master and implement at least 3 of these factors in order to achieve any real results, and 4 of them to be able to move on to the next level. Think about what I’ve said. If you’ve been spinning your wheels in beginner land for more than 6 months, you need to implement the steps above to get to the next level. Good luck.

The old myth of the muscle bound, “muscle headed” weight lifter has been dying a slow death. The evidence has been accumulating over the last 5 years that traditional weight training offers dramatic benefits for brain health, memory improvement, and reduction of risks for Alzheimer’s disease. It’s not just cardio, folks.

Keep_the_Fit's avatarkktrainingsystems

Would you lift weights if you knew it would sharpen your thinking?

There is growing evidence to substantiate that even something as simple as basic weight training can help protect against memory loss. In addition, it has been shown to keep thinking sharp, and prevent early onset of dementia, Alzheimer’s and other neurological conditions.

A recent six-month Canadian study examined the affects of strength training in inhibiting progression of dementia in women 70+ years of age. The outcome of the study proved favorable. It showed that exercise could be used as a mechanism for decreasing the rate of mental deterioration. This finding would not only prove beneficial with the elderly, but could also be applied to younger populations. There have been veritable studies released over the years showing the positive affects of exercise on young men and women. These affects include increased acuity, improved cognition, and mental quickness.

Another study…

View original post 310 more words

Creatine Side Effects: The Truth About Creatine Bloating, Creatine Diarrhea & other Dangers of Creatine | Nick Tumminello Hybrid Strength Training & Conditioning | Ft.Lauderdale Personal Trainer | Sports Performance & Bodybuilding

Sports Nutrition is such a murky mess.  If there is any one area related to fitness that is almost hopelessly mired in superstition, lies, half-truths, and misinformation, it is sports nutrition.  It’s not surprising.  There are so many magazines and supposed experts, and mis-informed medical personnel who believe they are experts, but have never done any actual research, and have not really read a preponderance of the research, before making up their minds.  To many in the medical community, the whole idea of strength training is anathema!  Back in the 1940’s there was a study that showed that strength training enlarged the heart, which was associated with increased risk of heart disease.  It was also seen as a socially marginal and suspect activity; practitioners were usually assumed to be homosexual, at a time when that label was many factors more prejudicial than they are today.

The simple fact is, there have been few supplements as exhaustively researched as creatine monohydrate, and no legitimate peer reviewed research (hundreds of them) have ever shown any negative side effects of statistical significance.  What’s especially infuriating is when you read an actual research study that concludes it is extremely safe, and then the authors of the study still insist on including warnings of possible negative side effects that the study they just published refuted.  Thats how hard preconceived beliefs, biases, and prejudices can be, to overcome.

What creatine supplementation will do for the vast majority of users is the following:

  1. Increase lean muscle mass
  2. Increase in body weight (due to increase muscle mass)
  3. Increase muscular strength
  4. Increased recovery times during and post workout
  5. Increase in anaerobic endurance (more reps)

Anyone interested in increased strength, increased muscular development, and power output should probably supplement if their diet does not include foods naturally rich in creatine.  Creatine is stored,; and consequently found; in muscle.  Beef and fish contain the highest concentrations, but the more processed and cooked, the less creatine will be available for human absorption.

The human body is capable of storing approximately 5-10 grams of creatine at any given time, and we naturally produce about 2 grams from our own internal resources.  To fully saturate our cells we need to make up the difference with diet and/or supplementation.

Aerobic endurance athletes will see less benefit from creatine supplementation as creatine is primarily a source of anaerobic energy.  Likewise, aerobic athletes often benefit from being light weight, and creatine can cause actual weight gain from the increased muscle mass.  this needs to be factored into an aerobic athletes decision whether to supplement or not.  It should be noted, though, that even with supplementation, weight and strength gains will be non-existent to minimal if not accompanied by a program of rigorous strength training.  There is no such thing as magic.

Below are links to a true expert who performs and reviews real research on the subject.  An educated exerciser gets results.

Creatine Side Effects: The Truth About Creatine Bloating, Creatine Diarrhea & other Dangers of Creatine | Nick Tumminello Hybrid Strength Training & Conditioning | Ft.Lauderdale Personal Trainer | Sports Performance & Bodybuilding: “”

(Via.)

Sprint to the Finish-another good post by kktainingsystems.

Sprint to the Finish.

 

Sprinting affects muscles in almost the exact same way intense weight lifting does.  For proof, look at the thighs of an Olympic marathoner and an Olympic sprinter, and you’ll get the idea.  The confusion the average person seems to be laboring under is that if they do a couple of sprint or intense weight lifting sessions a week they might “suddenly” wake up one morning looking like those kinds of athletes, instead of like the super model they ache to emulate.  If only either of those outcomes ere possible!  They are delusions.  Doing some high intensity training, appropriate for your age and current level of fitness will only speed up the process of you getting a little fitter than you are now.  Don’t worry.  Just do it!

A great nutritional post on why you should avoid any product containing, or being wholly composed of, hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated oils.

Keep_the_Fit's avatarkktrainingsystems

Processed chemicals that are used in foods have seriously detrimental effects on human health and energy levels and have no place in the modern human diet. To examine how processed chemicals impact human health, we will examine hydrogenated oils, also known as trans fats. We will see how these oils, which are healthy in their natural state, quickly turn into poisons through the manufacturing and processing.

Hydrogenated oils undergo an extensive transformation process. Healthy oils such as palm, kernel, soybean, corn oil or coconut oil are heated anywhere from five hundred to one thousand degrees under several atmospheres of pressure. Next, they are injected with a metallic catalyst (nickel, platinum or aluminum) for several hours. The catalyst bubbles up into the oil, changing the molecular structure and increasing the density of the oil. Now, instead of the oil being in a liquid state at room temperature, it is either a…

View original post 438 more words

The dangers of High Fructose corn syrup

Another excellent post by a well informed professional. I’d like to add that there are also a slew of negative environmental factors involved in te production of HFCS that are often overlooked by critics. When consuming sweet products, demand real sugar!

Keep_the_Fit's avatarkktrainingsystems

High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) comprises any of a group of corn syrups that has undergone enzymatic processing to convert some of its glucose into fructose to produce a desired sweetness. It is used in food products to enhance shelf life. According to the USDA, HFCS is composed of 24% water, and the rest sugars. It is very common in processed foods and beverages in the United States.  The most widely used varieties of high-fructose corn syrup are: HFCS 55 (mostly used in soft drinks), approximately 55% fructose and 42% glucose; and HFCS 42 (used in beverages, processed foods, cereals and baked goods), approximately 42% fructose and 53% glucose.

In the U.S., there has been a major transition from sucrose (table sugar) to HFCS in the food industry. Factors  causing this transition include governmental production quotas of domestic sugar, subsidies of U.S. corn, and an import tariff on foreign sugar.  All…

View original post 503 more words

HDL ‘Good Cholesterol’ Found Not to Cut Heart Risk – NYTimes.com

HDL ‘Good Cholesterol’ Found Not to Cut Heart Risk – NYTimes.com.

The “cholesterol” hypothesis of heart disease is amazingly complex and convoluted.  It is a fact that the German, French, and Italian, medical establishments do not believe cholesterol to be a major factor in heart disease, and do not test for it at all unless the patient has at least 3 other “major” risk factors: genetic predisposition (family history), high stress, and obesity, with the latter being the single most predictive risk factor for coronary artery diseases regardless of cholesterol levels.

I’d like to add that the citizens of Germany, Italy, and France, all enjoy longer life spans, and dramatically lower cases of coronary artery disease than U.S. citizens, and all have far fewer numbers of obese people, as well.

A recently completed 20 year study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association concluded that risk of heart disease is 90% determined by being overweight, regardless of any other risk factors, and simply losing weight is a persons best defense.

Again, this is a very complex story and cannot be fully understood without also examining the political and economic factors involved in the way american health medicine is manipulated by “for profit” entities.  My favorite quote from the article is the last one by Dr. Sekar Kathiresan, director of preventive cardiology at Massachusetts General Hospital and a geneticist at the Broad Institute of M.I.T. and Harvard:

“When people see numbers in the abnormal range they want to do something about it,” Dr. Kathiresan said. “It is very hard to get across the concept that the safest thing might be to leave people alone.”

And on a more chipper note here’s another health related link that makes me smile:

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/16/coffee-drinkers-may-live-longer/